“The 2013 law allowed for land lying unused for five years
after acquisition to be reverted to either the original owners or the state,
but the Amendment bill extends this period to years specified for the project
and exempts years spent in litigation”. Why this justifiable provision of the
Act should be cancelled? To satisfy whom? ?The
land resource is very limited in
India .It is very unfortunate that the BJP government does not realise that this limited resource should not be
allowed to remain idle with Corporates
in the name of industrial development.
Industrial growth can not take place at the expense of agricultural
sector which is in a miserable position
today. Every decision of the government need not be d guided by politial interest , economic and sociological impact of any
programme or law of the government should also be given due
consideration. If most of the opposition parties and the states and economists
and NGO oppose the ordinance on land acquisition, the government can not stand
on prestige . That will give a bad name to the government as government not
bothered about the agrarian population .
No comments:
Post a Comment